Cleared Traditional

HYPOTRANS MODEL 750 (K911577) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1992
Decision
457d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K911577 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HYPOTRANS MODEL 750. Classified as Container, Transport, Kidney (product code KDK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Martin Mclane Medical (La Mesa, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 8, 1992 after a review of 457 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.5880 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Gastroenterology & Urology submissions.

View all Martin Mclane Medical devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K911577 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 08, 1991
Decision Date July 08, 1992
Days to Decision 457 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
327d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 457d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KDK Container, Transport, Kidney
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.5880
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.