Cleared Traditional

K911865 - NORTEC CONNECTING TUBE SET (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1991
Decision
189d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K911865 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the NORTEC CONNECTING TUBE SET. Classified as Tubing, Noninvasive (product code GAZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by North American Sterilization & Packaging Co. (Sparta, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 1, 1991 after a review of 189 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.6740 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all North American Sterilization & Packaging Co. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K911865 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 26, 1991
Decision Date November 01, 1991
Days to Decision 189 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
61d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 189d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GAZ Tubing, Noninvasive
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.6740
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.