Cleared Traditional

K913574 - SEPTOCAL CAVITY LINER

K913574 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for SEPTOCAL CAVITY LINER by Specialites Septodont. It is a Class 2 Dental device (product code EJK) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 49-day FDA review.

K913574 · Specialites Septodont · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1991
Decision
49d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K913574 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SEPTOCAL CAVITY LINER. Classified as Liner, Cavity, Calcium Hydroxide (product code EJK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Specialites Septodont (Washington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 30, 1991 after a review of 49 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3250 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Specialites Septodont devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K913574 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 12, 1991
Decision Date September 30, 1991
Days to Decision 49 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
78d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 49d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EJK Liner, Cavity, Calcium Hydroxide
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.