Cleared Traditional

ST5500 UNIVERSAL CARE STRETCHER (K914543) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K914543 · Lic Care, Inc. · General Hospital
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1992
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K914543 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ST5500 UNIVERSAL CARE STRETCHER. Classified as Stretcher, Wheeled (product code FPO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Lic Care, Inc. (Arlington Heights, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 8, 1992 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.6910 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Lic Care, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K914543 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 10, 1991
Decision Date January 08, 1992
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
39d faster than avg
Panel avg: 129d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FPO Stretcher, Wheeled
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.6910
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.