Cleared Traditional

IL TEST ALPHA-1-ANTITRYPSIN (AAT) (K920005) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1992
Decision
209d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K920005 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the IL TEST ALPHA-1-ANTITRYPSIN (AAT). Classified as Alpha-1-antitrypsin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DEM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Instrumentation Laboratory CO (Lexington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 29, 1992 after a review of 209 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5130 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Instrumentation Laboratory CO devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K920005 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 02, 1992
Decision Date July 29, 1992
Days to Decision 209 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
105d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 209d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DEM Alpha-1-antitrypsin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5130
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.