Cleared Traditional

SNOWDEN-PENCER IRRIGATION PUMP (K920985) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Obstetrics & Gynecology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1992
Decision
99d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K920985 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SNOWDEN-PENCER IRRIGATION PUMP. Classified as Monitor, Heart-valve Movement, Fetal, Ultrasonic (product code HEI), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Snowden-Pencer (Tucker, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 9, 1992 after a review of 99 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.2660 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Obstetrics & Gynecology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Snowden-Pencer devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K920985 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 02, 1992
Decision Date June 09, 1992
Days to Decision 99 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
61d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 99d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HEI Monitor, Heart-valve Movement, Fetal, Ultrasonic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.2660
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.