Cleared Traditional

PE 400IR, PE 400T, PE 400E (K923234) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ear, Nose, Throat device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1992
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K923234 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PE 400IR, PE 400T, PE 400E. Classified as Hearing Aid, Group And Auditory Trainer (product code EPF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Phonic Ear, Inc. (Petaluma, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 29, 1992 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ear, Nose, Throat FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.3320 - the FDA ear, nose and throat device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ear, Nose, Throat review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Phonic Ear, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K923234 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 01, 1992
Decision Date September 29, 1992
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ear, Nose, Throat (EN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
1d slower than avg
Panel avg: 89d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EPF Hearing Aid, Group And Auditory Trainer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.3320
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ear, Nose, Throat devices follow this clearance model.