Cleared Traditional

K923487 - BAL CATH (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Ear, Nose, Throat device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1993
Decision
380d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K923487 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BAL CATH. Classified as Tube, Aspirating, Bronchoscope, Rigid (product code KTR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Ballard Medical Products (Draper, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 30, 1993 after a review of 380 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Ear, Nose, Throat FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.4680 - the FDA ear, nose and throat device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ear, Nose, Throat review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Ballard Medical Products devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K923487 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Special 510(k) (SESK)
Date Received July 15, 1992
Decision Date July 30, 1993
Days to Decision 380 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ear, Nose, Throat (EN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
291d slower than avg
Panel avg: 89d · This submission: 380d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KTR Tube, Aspirating, Bronchoscope, Rigid
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.4680
Definition If The Device Is Reusable, Validated Reprocessing Instructions And Reprocessing Validation Data For This Device Type Must Be Included In A 510(k) Submission (82 Fr 26807, Available At Https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/fr-2017-06-09/pdf/2017-12007.pdf).
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ear, Nose, Throat devices follow this clearance model.