Cleared Traditional

ABUSCREEN ONLINE FOR COCAINE METABOLITE (K924113) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Toxicology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1992
Decision
137d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K924113 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ABUSCREEN ONLINE FOR COCAINE METABOLITE. Classified as Hemagglutination, Cocaine Metabolites (benzoylecgnonine) (product code DLN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (Branchburg, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 28, 1992 after a review of 137 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Toxicology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.3250 - the FDA toxicology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Toxicology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Roche Diagnostic Systems, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K924113 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 13, 1992
Decision Date December 28, 1992
Days to Decision 137 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Toxicology (TX)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
50d slower than avg
Panel avg: 87d · This submission: 137d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DLN Hemagglutination, Cocaine Metabolites (benzoylecgnonine)
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.3250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Toxicology devices follow this clearance model.