Cleared Traditional

FEMININE HEAT WRAP (K924970) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Physical Medicine device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K924970 · Conair Corp. · Physical Medicine device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1994
Decision
733d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K924970 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the FEMININE HEAT WRAP. Classified as Pad, Heating, Powered (product code IRT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Conair Corp. (Stamford, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 3, 1994 after a review of 733 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Physical Medicine FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 890.5740 - the FDA physical medicine device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Physical Medicine submissions.

View all Conair Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K924970 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - NSE Converted (SN)
Date Received September 30, 1992
Decision Date October 03, 1994
Days to Decision 733 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Physical Medicine (PM)
Summary -
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
618d slower than avg
Panel avg: 115d · This submission: 733d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code IRT Pad, Heating, Powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 890.5740
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Physical Medicine devices follow this clearance model.