Cleared Traditional

K926357 - MEDTRONIC BIO-MEDICUS HANDCRANK MODEL 150 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1993
Decision
163d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K926357 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MEDTRONIC BIO-MEDICUS HANDCRANK MODEL 150. Classified as Control, Pump Speed, Cardiopulmonary Bypass (product code DWA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc. (Eden Prairie, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 2, 1993 after a review of 163 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4380 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K926357 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 21, 1992
Decision Date June 02, 1993
Days to Decision 163 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
38d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 163d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DWA Control, Pump Speed, Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4380
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.