Cleared Traditional

K930418 - CRYPTO-LEX SYSTEM (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Microbiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1994
Decision
387d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K930418 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CRYPTO-LEX SYSTEM. Classified as Antisera, Latex Agglutination, Cryptococcus Neoformans (product code GMD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Trinity Laboratories, Inc. (Raleigh, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 17, 1994 after a review of 387 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Microbiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.3165 - the FDA microbiology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Microbiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Trinity Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K930418 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 26, 1993
Decision Date February 17, 1994
Days to Decision 387 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Microbiology (MI)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
285d slower than avg
Panel avg: 102d · This submission: 387d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GMD Antisera, Latex Agglutination, Cryptococcus Neoformans
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.3165
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Microbiology devices follow this clearance model.