Cleared Traditional

K930501 - DU PONT ACA NEV/EEV VERIFIER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K930501 · Dupont Medical Products · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1993
Decision
189d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K930501 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DU PONT ACA NEV/EEV VERIFIER. Classified as Calibrator, Primary (product code JIS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dupont Medical Products (Wilmington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 9, 1993 after a review of 189 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1150 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Dupont Medical Products devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K930501 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 01, 1993
Decision Date August 09, 1993
Days to Decision 189 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
101d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 189d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JIS Calibrator, Primary
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1150
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.