Cleared Traditional

K930806 - ZYMED HOLTER SCANNER MODEL 2010 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K930806 · Agilent Technologies · Cardiovascular device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1994
Decision
433d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K930806 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ZYMED HOLTER SCANNER MODEL 2010. Classified as Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable (product code DQK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Agilent Technologies (Camarillo, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 25, 1994 after a review of 433 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1425 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Cardiovascular submissions.

View all Agilent Technologies devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K930806 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 16, 1993
Decision Date April 25, 1994
Days to Decision 433 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
308d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 433d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DQK Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1425
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - DQK Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable

All 426
Devices cleared under the same product code (DQK) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K930806.
EnSite™ X EP System
K260212 · Abbott Medical · Apr 2026
ACORYS MAPPING SYSTEM
K253861 · Corify Care S.L · Apr 2026
Synchrony
K253473 · Stereotaxis, Inc. · Apr 2026
HemoSphere Nano Monitor (HSNANO1)
K253186 · Edwards Lifesciences, LLC · Feb 2026
CARTO™ 3 EP Navigation System V8.4
K252972 · Biosense Webster, Inc. · Feb 2026
IOPS Visionary System (MC-3)
K254089 · Centerline Biomedical, Inc. · Feb 2026