Cleared Traditional

K932788 - CORDIS BIPAL 7 BIOPSY FORCEPS WITH A INLINE HANDLE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K932788 · Cordis Corp. · Cardiovascular device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1993
Decision
84d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K932788 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CORDIS BIPAL 7 BIOPSY FORCEPS WITH A INLINE HANDLE. Classified as Device, Biopsy, Endomyocardial (product code DWZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Cordis Corp. (Miami Lakes, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 1, 1993 after a review of 84 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.4075 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Cordis Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K932788 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 09, 1993
Decision Date September 01, 1993
Days to Decision 84 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
41d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 84d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DWZ Device, Biopsy, Endomyocardial
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.4075
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.