Cleared Traditional

K933391 - ATRIUM'S HYBRID PTFE (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1994
Decision
521d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K933391 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ATRIUM'S HYBRID PTFE. Classified as Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of Less Then 6mm Diameter (product code DYF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Atrium Medical Corp. (Hollis, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 15, 1994 after a review of 521 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3450 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Cardiovascular submissions.

View all Atrium Medical Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K933391 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Product Development Protocol (SESP)
Date Received July 12, 1993
Decision Date December 15, 1994
Days to Decision 521 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
396d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 521d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DYF Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of Less Then 6mm Diameter
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.