Cleared Traditional

K934843 - URINARY/CEBROSPINAL FLUID PROTEIN CALIBRATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K934843 · E.I. Dupont DE Nemours & Co., Inc. · Chemistry device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Mar 1994
Decision
154d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K934843 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the URINARY/CEBROSPINAL FLUID PROTEIN CALIBRATOR. Classified as Calibrator, Secondary (product code JIT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by E.I. Dupont DE Nemours & Co., Inc. (Wilmington, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on March 11, 1994 after a review of 154 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1150 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all E.I. Dupont DE Nemours & Co., Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K934843 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 08, 1993
Decision Date March 11, 1994
Days to Decision 154 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
66d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 154d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JIT Calibrator, Secondary
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1150
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.