Cleared Traditional

DADE(R) THROMBIN-ANTITHROMBIN (TAT) COMPLEX ELISA (K935307) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1994
Decision
385d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K935307 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DADE(R) THROMBIN-ANTITHROMBIN (TAT) COMPLEX ELISA. Classified as Antigen, Antiserum, Control, Antithrombin Iii (product code DDQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Baxter Diagnostics, Inc. (Miami, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 22, 1994 after a review of 385 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7060 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Hematology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Baxter Diagnostics, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K935307 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 02, 1993
Decision Date November 22, 1994
Days to Decision 385 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
272d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 385d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DDQ Antigen, Antiserum, Control, Antithrombin Iii
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7060
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.