Cleared Traditional

PLASMA FIBRINOGEN CONTROL LEVEL 1/LEVEL 2 (K935598) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1995
Decision
529d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K935598 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PLASMA FIBRINOGEN CONTROL LEVEL 1/LEVEL 2. Classified as Plasma, Fibrinogen Control (product code GIL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Clinical Controls, Inc. (Grover Beach, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 2, 1995 after a review of 529 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7340 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: High-complexity regulatory submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. The extended review timeline suggests the FDA required additional documentation before confirming substantial equivalence - a pattern common in complex or first-of-kind Hematology submissions.

View all Clinical Controls, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K935598 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 19, 1993
Decision Date May 02, 1995
Days to Decision 529 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
416d slower than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 529d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code GIL Plasma, Fibrinogen Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7340
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.