Cleared Traditional

BELTONE SERIES 100 AUDIOMETERS (K940216) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ear, Nose, Throat device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K940216 · Beltone Electronics Corp. · Ear, Nose, Throat device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1994
Decision
196d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K940216 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BELTONE SERIES 100 AUDIOMETERS. Classified as Audiometer (product code EWO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Beltone Electronics Corp. (Chicago, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 29, 1994 after a review of 196 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Ear, Nose, Throat FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.1050 - the FDA ear, nose and throat device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ear, Nose, Throat review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Beltone Electronics Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K940216 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 14, 1994
Decision Date July 29, 1994
Days to Decision 196 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ear, Nose, Throat (EN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
107d slower than avg
Panel avg: 89d · This submission: 196d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EWO Audiometer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.1050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ear, Nose, Throat devices follow this clearance model.