Cleared Traditional

K940817 - TDX(R)/TDXFLX(R) FETAL LUNG MATURITY II (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Chemistry device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1995
Decision
351d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K940817 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TDX(R)/TDXFLX(R) FETAL LUNG MATURITY II. Classified as Colorimetric Method, Lecithin/sphingomyelin Ratio (product code JHF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Abbott Laboratories (Abbott Park, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 8, 1995 after a review of 351 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Chemistry FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 862.1455 - the FDA in vitro diagnostics and chemistry framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Chemistry review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Abbott Laboratories devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K940817 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 22, 1994
Decision Date February 08, 1995
Days to Decision 351 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Chemistry (CH)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
263d slower than avg
Panel avg: 88d · This submission: 351d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JHF Colorimetric Method, Lecithin/sphingomyelin Ratio
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 862.1455
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Chemistry devices follow this clearance model.