Cleared Traditional

K941008 - COMPLETE CPR KIT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K941008 · Mtm Health Products , Ltd. · Anesthesiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1994
Decision
254d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K941008 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COMPLETE CPR KIT. Classified as Valve, Non-rebreathing (product code CBP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mtm Health Products , Ltd. (L7r 2e3, CA). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 10, 1994 after a review of 254 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5870 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mtm Health Products , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K941008 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Special 510(k) (SESK)
Date Received March 01, 1994
Decision Date November 10, 1994
Days to Decision 254 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
115d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 254d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBP Valve, Non-rebreathing
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5870
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.