Cleared Traditional

FISHER-PRICE DRY NIGHT MONITOR (K942057) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1994
Decision
91d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K942057 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the FISHER-PRICE DRY NIGHT MONITOR. Classified as Alarm, Conditioned Response Enuresis (product code KPN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Fisher Price (East Aurora, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 28, 1994 after a review of 91 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.2040 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Fisher Price devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K942057 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 28, 1994
Decision Date July 28, 1994
Days to Decision 91 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
39d faster than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 91d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KPN Alarm, Conditioned Response Enuresis
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.2040
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.