Cleared Traditional

LAPAROSCOPIC/ENDOSCOPIC INSTRUEMENT (K943989) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Obstetrics & Gynecology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1994
Decision
27d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K943989 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the LAPAROSCOPIC/ENDOSCOPIC INSTRUEMENT. Classified as Recorder, Pressure, Intrauterine (product code HFO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Gabris Surgical Corp. (Virginia Beach, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 12, 1994 after a review of 27 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.2700 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Gabris Surgical Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K943989 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 16, 1994
Decision Date September 12, 1994
Days to Decision 27 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
133d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 27d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HFO Recorder, Pressure, Intrauterine
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.2700
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.