Cleared Traditional

MTB 1043 TREATMENT BOOTH (K944133) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1995
Decision
379d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K944133 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MTB 1043 TREATMENT BOOTH. Classified as Chamber, Patient Isolation (product code LGM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mark Solutions, Inc. (Maywood, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 7, 1995 after a review of 379 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5450 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mark Solutions, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K944133 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 24, 1994
Decision Date September 07, 1995
Days to Decision 379 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
250d slower than avg
Panel avg: 129d · This submission: 379d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LGM Chamber, Patient Isolation
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.