Cleared Traditional

GAME AUDIOMETERY WORD IDENTIFICATION AUDIOMETRY FOR USE WITH PRODIGIT(TM) 2000 PERSONAL DIGITAL AUDIOMETER(TM) (K945689) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ear, Nose, Throat device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1995
Decision
79d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K945689 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the GAME AUDIOMETERY WORD IDENTIFICATION AUDIOMETRY FOR USE WITH PRODIGIT(TM) 200.... Classified as Audiometer (product code EWO), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Calmed Technology, Inc. (Union City, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 8, 1995 after a review of 79 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ear, Nose, Throat FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 874.1050 - the FDA ear, nose and throat device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Calmed Technology, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K945689 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 21, 1994
Decision Date February 08, 1995
Days to Decision 79 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ear, Nose, Throat (EN)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
10d faster than avg
Panel avg: 89d · This submission: 79d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EWO Audiometer
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 874.1050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ear, Nose, Throat devices follow this clearance model.