Cleared Traditional

K945822 - CAPNO-FLO(TM) REGULATOR (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K945822 · Kirk Specialty Systems · Anesthesiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1995
Decision
87d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K945822 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CAPNO-FLO(TM) REGULATOR. Classified as Valve, Non-rebreathing (product code CBP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Kirk Specialty Systems (Carrollton, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 24, 1995 after a review of 87 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5870 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Kirk Specialty Systems devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K945822 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received November 29, 1994
Decision Date February 24, 1995
Days to Decision 87 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
52d faster than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 87d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBP Valve, Non-rebreathing
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5870
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.