Cleared Traditional

K946060 - REMINGTON MEDICAL DISPOSABLE FLUORO/EQUIPMENT COVER MODEL RMI8 (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K946060 · Remington Medical, Inc. · General Hospital
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1995
Decision
146d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K946060 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the REMINGTON MEDICAL DISPOSABLE FLUORO/EQUIPMENT COVER MODEL RMI8. Classified as Drape, Surgical (product code KKX), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Remington Medical, Inc. (Atlanta, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 27, 1995 after a review of 146 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 878.4370 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the General Hospital review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Remington Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K946060 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received December 02, 1994
Decision Date April 27, 1995
Days to Decision 146 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
18d slower than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 146d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KKX Drape, Surgical
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 878.4370
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.