Cleared Traditional

K950532 - TROPHY RADIOLOGIE RVG PORTABLE RADIOVISIOGRAPHY (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K950532 · Trophy Radiologie · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Apr 1995
Decision
71d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K950532 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the TROPHY RADIOLOGIE RVG PORTABLE RADIOVISIOGRAPHY. Classified as Unit, X-ray, Intraoral (product code EAP), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Trophy Radiologie (Vincennes, Cedex (Paris), FR). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on April 19, 1995 after a review of 71 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.1810 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Trophy Radiologie devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K950532 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received February 07, 1995
Decision Date April 19, 1995
Days to Decision 71 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
36d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 71d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code EAP Unit, X-ray, Intraoral
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.1810
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.