Cleared Traditional

FIBER HEAD LIGHT FH-300 (K951337) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K951337 · Neitz Instruments Company, Ltd. · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jun 1995
Decision
76d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K951337 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the FIBER HEAD LIGHT FH-300. Classified as Headlamp, Operating, Ac-powered (product code HPQ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Neitz Instruments Company, Ltd. (Tokyo, JP). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on June 8, 1995 after a review of 76 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4335 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Neitz Instruments Company, Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K951337 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 24, 1995
Decision Date June 08, 1995
Days to Decision 76 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
34d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 76d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HPQ Headlamp, Operating, Ac-powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4335
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.