Cleared Traditional

K952360 - CARDIAC STATUS, LIFESIGN MI, VITALSIGN, ACCUSIGN CK-MB/MYOGLOBIN (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Aug 1995
Decision
103d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K952360 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the CARDIAC STATUS, LIFESIGN MI, VITALSIGN, ACCUSIGN CK-MB/MYOGLOBIN. Classified as Myoglobin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control (product code DDR), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Princeton BioMeditech Corp. (Monmouth Junction, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on August 14, 1995 after a review of 103 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5680 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Princeton BioMeditech Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K952360 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 03, 1995
Decision Date August 14, 1995
Days to Decision 103 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
1d faster than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 103d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DDR Myoglobin, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5680
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.