Cleared Traditional

EIDOS 5003 HOLTER SYSTEM (K952969) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1996
Decision
385d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K952969 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the EIDOS 5003 HOLTER SYSTEM. Classified as Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable (product code DQK), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by New Product Development, Inc. (East Syracuse, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 16, 1996 after a review of 385 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.1425 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Cardiovascular review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all New Product Development, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K952969 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received June 27, 1995
Decision Date July 16, 1996
Days to Decision 385 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
260d slower than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 385d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DQK Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.1425
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - DQK Computer, Diagnostic, Programmable

All 175
Devices cleared under the same product code (DQK) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K952969.
LABSYSTEM III EP LABORATORY W/WINDOWS PLATFORM & WINDOWS EP SOFTWARE VERSION 1.0
K031000 · C.R. Bard, Inc. · Jun 2003
QUINTON Q-CATH, MODEL 000460
K021906 · Quinton, Inc. · Sep 2002
ASTRONOMER+WITH SLD
K003362 · Boston Scientific Corp · Mar 2001
STRESSWRITER EXERCISE TESTING SYSTEM
K961009 · Hewlett-Packard Co. · Jun 1996
ACCUSTRESS EXERCISE TESTING SYSTEM
K953127 · Hewlett-Packard Co. · Feb 1996
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT AND DISPLAY SYSTEMS
K920587 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Jan 1993