Cleared Traditional

THERATEST LAB, INC., EL-ANASCR KIT (K954106) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1995
Decision
105d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K954106 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the THERATEST LAB, INC., EL-ANASCR KIT. Classified as Antinuclear Antibody (enzyme-labeled), Antigen, Controls (product code LJM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Theratest Laboratories, Inc. (Chicago, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 14, 1995 after a review of 105 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5100 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Theratest Laboratories, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K954106 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 01, 1995
Decision Date November 14, 1995
Days to Decision 105 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
1d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 105d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LJM Antinuclear Antibody (enzyme-labeled), Antigen, Controls
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5100
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.