Cleared Traditional

BETA MULTI-PROCEDURE MOBILE UROLOGICAL TABLE, MODEL S5005 (K954278) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1995
Decision
19d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K954278 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BETA MULTI-PROCEDURE MOBILE UROLOGICAL TABLE, MODEL S5005. Classified as Table, Cystometric, Electric (product code MMZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Beta Medical Products, Inc. (Akron, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 2, 1995 after a review of 19 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.4890 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Beta Medical Products, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K954278 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received September 13, 1995
Decision Date October 02, 1995
Days to Decision 19 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
111d faster than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 19d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MMZ Table, Cystometric, Electric
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.4890
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.