Cleared Traditional

HANEL MAVIG MONITOR SUSPENSION SYSTEM (K954945) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Radiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K954945 · F. Walter Hanel GmbH · Radiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1996
Decision
91d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K954945 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the HANEL MAVIG MONITOR SUSPENSION SYSTEM. Classified as System, X-ray, Fluoroscopic, Image-intensified (product code JAA), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by F. Walter Hanel GmbH (North Attleboro, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 29, 1996 after a review of 91 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Radiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 892.1650 - the FDA radiology and imaging software oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Radiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all F. Walter Hanel GmbH devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K954945 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 30, 1995
Decision Date January 29, 1996
Days to Decision 91 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Radiology (RA)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
16d faster than avg
Panel avg: 107d · This submission: 91d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JAA System, X-ray, Fluoroscopic, Image-intensified
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 892.1650
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Radiology devices follow this clearance model.

Regulatory Peers - JAA System, X-ray, Fluoroscopic, Image-intensified

All 72
Devices cleared under the same product code (JAA) and FDA review panel - the closest regulatory comparables to K954945.
CAREGRAPH
K982319 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Sep 1998
FLUOROSPOT COMPACT
K982028 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Jul 1998
SIREGRAPH CF
K960266 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · Mar 1996
MAX-1000A/R1
K954590 · Toshiba America Medical Systems, In.C · Nov 1995
FLUOREX DTA-400A
K946081 · Toshiba America Medical Systems, In.C · May 1995
SIRESKOP SX
K951358 · Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. · May 1995