Cleared Traditional

K961024 - BIOSIGN MONO-PLUS WB,BIOSIGN MONO WB,MONO-PLUS WB,ACCUSIGN MONO WB (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Immunology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Feb 1997
Decision
327d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K961024 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the BIOSIGN MONO-PLUS WB,BIOSIGN MONO WB,MONO-PLUS WB,ACCUSIGN MONO WB. Classified as System, Test, Infectious Mononucleosis (product code KTN), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Princeton BioMeditech Corp. (Monmouth Junction, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on February 4, 1997 after a review of 327 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Immunology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 866.5640 - the FDA immunology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Immunology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Princeton BioMeditech Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K961024 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 14, 1996
Decision Date February 04, 1997
Days to Decision 327 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Immunology (IM)
Summary Statement
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
223d slower than avg
Panel avg: 104d · This submission: 327d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code KTN System, Test, Infectious Mononucleosis
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 866.5640
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Immunology devices follow this clearance model.