Cleared Traditional

MTI-MP TRANSITIONAL IMPLANTS AND MODULAR PROSTHETIC SYSTEM (K961704) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Dental device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K961704 · Dentatus USA , Ltd. · Dental device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1996
Decision
85d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K961704 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MTI-MP TRANSITIONAL IMPLANTS AND MODULAR PROSTHETIC SYSTEM. Classified as Splint, Endodontic Stabilizing (product code ELS), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Dentatus USA , Ltd. (New York, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 26, 1996 after a review of 85 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Dental FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 872.3890 - the FDA dental device regulatory framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Dentatus USA , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K961704 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 02, 1996
Decision Date July 26, 1996
Days to Decision 85 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Dental (DE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
42d faster than avg
Panel avg: 127d · This submission: 85d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code ELS Splint, Endodontic Stabilizing
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 872.3890
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Dental devices follow this clearance model.