Cleared Traditional

NEW COMFORT CONTACT LENS CARE ACCESSORY (K962112) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K962112 · Lens Comfort, Inc. · Ophthalmic device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Nov 1996
Decision
182d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K962112 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the NEW COMFORT CONTACT LENS CARE ACCESSORY. Classified as Accessories, Solution, Ultrasonic Cleaners For Lenses (product code LYL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Lens Comfort, Inc. (Elizabeth, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on November 29, 1996 after a review of 182 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.5928 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Lens Comfort, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K962112 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 31, 1996
Decision Date November 29, 1996
Days to Decision 182 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
72d slower than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 182d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LYL Accessories, Solution, Ultrasonic Cleaners For Lenses
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.5928
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.