Cleared Traditional

ACTIS (VENOUS FLOW CONTROLLER) (K962915) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Gastroenterology & Urology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1996
Decision
137d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K962915 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ACTIS (VENOUS FLOW CONTROLLER). Classified as Device, External Penile Rigidity (product code LKY), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Vivus, Inc. (Menlo Park, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 10, 1996 after a review of 137 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Gastroenterology & Urology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 876.5020 - the FDA gastroenterology and urology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Gastroenterology & Urology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Vivus, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K962915 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 26, 1996
Decision Date December 10, 1996
Days to Decision 137 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Gastroenterology & Urology (GU)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
7d slower than avg
Panel avg: 130d · This submission: 137d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LKY Device, External Penile Rigidity
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 876.5020
Definition Intended To Create Or Maintain Sufficient Penile Rigidity For Sexual Intercourse. These Include Vacuum Pumps, Constriction Rings, And Penile Splints, Which Are Mechanical, Powered Or Pneumatic Devices.
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Gastroenterology & Urology devices follow this clearance model.