Cleared Traditional

K963202 - MEGA ME 3000 PROFESSIONAL MUSCLE TESTER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Neurology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K963202 · Mega Electronics , Ltd. · Neurology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1997
Decision
277d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K963202 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MEGA ME 3000 PROFESSIONAL MUSCLE TESTER. Classified as Device, Biofeedback (product code HCC), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Mega Electronics , Ltd. (Eagan, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 19, 1997 after a review of 277 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Neurology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 882.5050 - the FDA neurology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Neurology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Mega Electronics , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K963202 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 15, 1996
Decision Date May 19, 1997
Days to Decision 277 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Neurology (NE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
129d slower than avg
Panel avg: 148d · This submission: 277d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HCC Device, Biofeedback
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 882.5050
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Neurology devices follow this clearance model.