Cleared Traditional

MICROSPAN INSEMINATION SYSTEM (K970750) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Obstetrics & Gynecology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

K970750 · Imagyn Medical, Inc. · Obstetrics & Gynecology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1997
Decision
63d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K970750 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the MICROSPAN INSEMINATION SYSTEM. Classified as Cannula, Intrauterine Insemination (product code MFD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Imagyn Medical, Inc. (Laguna Niguel, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 5, 1997 after a review of 63 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.5250 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Imagyn Medical, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K970750 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 03, 1997
Decision Date May 05, 1997
Days to Decision 63 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
97d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 63d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MFD Cannula, Intrauterine Insemination
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.5250
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.