Cleared Traditional

K971461 - SERVO-CONTROL WALL-MOUNT INFANT WARMER(IW980)/MANUAL-CONTROL WALL-MOUNT INFANT WARMER(IW990) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II General Hospital device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1997
Decision
86d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K971461 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SERVO-CONTROL WALL-MOUNT INFANT WARMER(IW980)/MANUAL-CONTROL WALL-MOUNT INFAN.... Classified as Warmer, Infant Radiant (product code FMT), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Fisher & Paykel Electronics , Ltd. (Auckland, NZ). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 16, 1997 after a review of 86 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the General Hospital FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 880.5130 - the FDA general hospital device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Fisher & Paykel Electronics , Ltd. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K971461 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received April 21, 1997
Decision Date July 16, 1997
Days to Decision 86 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel General Hospital (HO)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
42d faster than avg
Panel avg: 128d · This submission: 86d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code FMT Warmer, Infant Radiant
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 880.5130
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most General Hospital devices follow this clearance model.