Cleared Traditional

IVALON PVA SURGICAL SPEAR, IVALON EYE DRAIN, 80CC, IVALON EYE DRAIN, 400CC, IVALON EYE WICK (K971832) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1997
Decision
73d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K971832 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the IVALON PVA SURGICAL SPEAR, IVALON EYE DRAIN, 80CC, IVALON EYE DRAIN, 400CC, I.... Classified as Sponge, Ophthalmic (product code HOZ), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by M-Pact Worldwide Management Corp. (Eudora, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 31, 1997 after a review of 73 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.4790 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all M-Pact Worldwide Management Corp. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K971832 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received May 19, 1997
Decision Date July 31, 1997
Days to Decision 73 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
37d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 73d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HOZ Sponge, Ophthalmic
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.4790
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.