Cleared Traditional

INFINITECH BULLET ENDO ILLUMINATED PICK MANIPULATOR (K972506) - FDA 510(k) Clearance

Class II Ophthalmic device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Oct 1997
Decision
90d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K972506 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the INFINITECH BULLET ENDO ILLUMINATED PICK MANIPULATOR. Classified as Transilluminator, Ac-powered (product code HJM), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Infinitech, Inc. (Chesterfield, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on October 1, 1997 after a review of 90 days - within the typical 510(k) review window.

This device falls under the Ophthalmic FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 886.1945 - the FDA ophthalmic device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Ophthalmic review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Infinitech, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K972506 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received July 03, 1997
Decision Date October 01, 1997
Days to Decision 90 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Ophthalmic (OP)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
20d faster than avg
Panel avg: 110d · This submission: 90d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code HJM Transilluminator, Ac-powered
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 886.1945
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Ophthalmic devices follow this clearance model.