Cleared Traditional

K972908 - SANDS SERIES III HYPERBARIC CHAMBER (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jul 1998
Decision
350d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K972908 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the SANDS SERIES III HYPERBARIC CHAMBER. Classified as Chamber, Hyperbaric (product code CBF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Sands Hyperbarics (Los Angeles, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on July 22, 1998 after a review of 350 days - an unusually long review period, suggesting complex equivalence evaluation.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5470 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Elevated predicate reliance profile. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Sands Hyperbarics devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K972908 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received August 06, 1997
Decision Date July 22, 1998
Days to Decision 350 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
211d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 350d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code CBF Chamber, Hyperbaric
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5470
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.