Cleared Traditional

K981076 - VENAFLO PTFE VASCULAR GRAFT, VENAFLO GRAFT WITH CARBON, VENAFLO VASCULAR GRAFT (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Cardiovascular device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1998
Decision
44d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K981076 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the VENAFLO PTFE VASCULAR GRAFT, VENAFLO GRAFT WITH CARBON, VENAFLO VASCULAR GRAFT. Classified as Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of Less Then 6mm Diameter (product code DYF), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Impra, Inc. (Tempe, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 7, 1998 after a review of 44 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Cardiovascular FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 870.3450 - the FDA cardiovascular device oversight framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Impra, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K981076 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 24, 1998
Decision Date May 07, 1998
Days to Decision 44 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Cardiovascular (CV)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
81d faster than avg
Panel avg: 125d · This submission: 44d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code DYF Prosthesis, Vascular Graft, Of Less Then 6mm Diameter
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 870.3450
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Cardiovascular devices follow this clearance model.