Cleared Traditional

K983609 - COOK TEST TUBE HEATER

K983609 is the FDA 510(k) clearance for COOK TEST TUBE HEATER by Cook Ob/Gyn. It is a Class 2 Obstetrics & Gynecology device (product code MQG) cleared through the Traditional 510(k) pathway after a 63-day FDA review.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Dec 1998
Decision
63d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K983609 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the COOK TEST TUBE HEATER. Classified as Accessory, Assisted Reproduction (product code MQG), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Cook Ob/Gyn (Spencer, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on December 16, 1998 after a review of 63 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Obstetrics & Gynecology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 884.6120 - the FDA obstetrics and gynecology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Cook Ob/Gyn devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K983609 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received October 14, 1998
Decision Date December 16, 1998
Days to Decision 63 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Obstetrics & Gynecology (OB)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Combination Product No
PCCP Authorized No
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
97d faster than avg
Panel avg: 160d · This submission: 63d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code MQG Accessory, Assisted Reproduction
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 884.6120
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Obstetrics & Gynecology devices follow this clearance model.