Cleared Special

K990132 - DATEX-OHMEDA ANESTHESIA VAPORIZER, MODEL D-TEC (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through the Special 510(k) pathway - typically does not require clinical trials.

K990132 · Datex-Ohmeda, Inc. · Anesthesiology device
Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Jan 1999
Decision
7d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K990132 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the DATEX-OHMEDA ANESTHESIA VAPORIZER, MODEL D-TEC. Classified as Vaporizer, Anesthesia, Non-heated (product code CAD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Datex-Ohmeda, Inc. (Madison, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on January 21, 1999 after a review of 7 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.5880 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. As a Special 510(k), this submission covers a manufacturer modification to an existing cleared device rather than a new device introduction.

Device pattern: Iterative device modification. Low regulatory complexity profile. This Special 510(k) clearance confirms that the manufacturer's modifications remained within the established regulatory envelope of the original cleared device.

View all Datex-Ohmeda, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K990132 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received January 14, 1999
Decision Date January 21, 1999
Days to Decision 7 days
Submission Type Special
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
132d faster than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 7d
Pathway characteristics
Modification to existing cleared device.

Device Classification

Product Code CAD Vaporizer, Anesthesia, Non-heated
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.5880
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.