Cleared Traditional

K990957 - ASTORIA-PACIFIC SPOTCHECK G6PD KIT 50 HR, MODEL 80-3000-13K (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Hematology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
May 1999
Decision
50d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K990957 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the ASTORIA-PACIFIC SPOTCHECK G6PD KIT 50 HR, MODEL 80-3000-13K. Classified as Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (erythrocytic), Quantitative (product code JBL), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Astoria-Pacific, Inc. (Clackamas, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on May 11, 1999 after a review of 50 days - a notably fast clearance cycle.

This device falls under the Hematology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 864.7360 - the FDA hematology device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Fast-track predicate clearance. Standard predicate reliance. The short review cycle indicates strong predicate alignment - the FDA found sufficient equivalence without extended technical review.

View all Astoria-Pacific, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K990957 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 22, 1999
Decision Date May 11, 1999
Days to Decision 50 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Hematology (HE)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
63d faster than avg
Panel avg: 113d · This submission: 50d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code JBL Glucose-6-phosphate Dehydrogenase (erythrocytic), Quantitative
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 864.7360
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Hematology devices follow this clearance model.