Cleared Traditional

K990960 - PERIMED TRANSCUTANEOUS PO2 AND PCO2 MONITOR (PF5040) (FDA 510(k) Clearance)

Class II Anesthesiology device cleared through predicate-based substantial equivalence - typically does not require clinical trials.

Download Printable Device Report (PDF)
Optimized for regulatory review, auditing and printing
Sep 1999
Decision
185d
Days
Class 2
Risk

K990960 is an FDA 510(k) clearance for the PERIMED TRANSCUTANEOUS PO2 AND PCO2 MONITOR (PF5040). Classified as Monitor, Carbon-dioxide, Cutaneous (product code LKD), Class II - Special Controls.

Submitted by Perimed, Inc. (Laurel, US). The FDA issued a Cleared decision on September 23, 1999 after a review of 185 days - an extended review cycle.

This device falls under the Anesthesiology FDA review panel, regulated under 21 CFR 868.2480 - the FDA anesthesiology and respiratory device framework. The Traditional 510(k) pathway establishes clearance through substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, without requiring clinical trial data.

Device pattern: Standard predicate-based submission. Standard predicate reliance. This clearance follows a standard predicate-based equivalence path within the Anesthesiology review framework, consistent with the majority of Class II 510(k) submissions.

View all Perimed, Inc. devices

Submission Details

510(k) Number K990960 FDA.gov
FDA Decision Cleared Substantially Equivalent - Traditional 510(k) (SESE)
Date Received March 22, 1999
Decision Date September 23, 1999
Days to Decision 185 days
Submission Type Traditional
Review Panel Anesthesiology (AN)
Summary Summary PDF
Third-party Review No - reviewed directly by FDA
Regulatory Context
Review time vs. panel average
46d slower than avg
Panel avg: 139d · This submission: 185d
Pathway characteristics
Predicate-based equivalence. No clinical trials required.

Device Classification

Product Code LKD Monitor, Carbon-dioxide, Cutaneous
Device Class Class 2 - Special Controls
CFR Regulation 21 CFR 868.2480
What this classification means

Class II devices require demonstration of substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device. This pathway does not require clinical trials - it relies on engineering equivalence and performance data. Most Anesthesiology devices follow this clearance model.